fbpx

What are you looking for?

Search

ICF MCQ: Questions, Comments and Ongoing Discussion

Back

ICF MCQ: Questions, Comments and Ongoing Discussion

The introduction of the ICF Mentor Coach Qualification (MCQ) has generated considerable discussion across the coaching community, including a wide range of questions, perspectives and reactions.

As the ICF continues to release information in stages, there are still areas where further clarification is emerging. Many coaches are considering what these changes mean for their current practice, training and future plans.

We have shared our current understanding of the MCQ, and what it means for both ReciproCoach and non-ReciproCoach mentor coaches, on our MCQ information page. Please read this before posting a question below, as it is likely that many common questions have already been addressed. We also encourage coaches to refer to official ICF documentation for confirmation of requirements as they continue to evolve.

This page is intended as a space for coaches to share questions, comments and experiences as we collectively navigate the shift toward the MCQ, particularly for those who have completed or are considering completing the ReciproCoach MCQ Mentor Coach Training.

If you have a question, comment or experience to share in relation to these changes, we invite you to add it below and open it up for broader discussion.

ReciproCoach will continue to monitor developments and share relevant updates here as further information is released by the ICF.

One Reply to “ICF MCQ: Questions, Comments and Ongoing Discussion”

  • Thanks for all the research and information! You’re tackling so much.

    My big questions:
    – for ReciproCoach: for the recommended mentors, will the proposed rate change?
    – for ICF: what do we know about use of an AI assist (eg RaeNotes) for completing assessments?
    – for ReciproCoach: can ReciproCoach generate a transcript of completed training sessions for its mentors?
    – for ICF: the PCC Markers training was 40+ hours, does that qualify as training for the standard pathway?

    I’m also wondering what they mean about helping clients attain credentials (for the “credit for prior learning” pathway) . That’s a rather vague indication.

    I’m also curious if your training program is geared towards those of us who are experienced mentors! I’m not clear what I’d be registering for.

Leave a Reply to Betsy Block Cancel reply

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Related Articles

You can’t think your way out of a problem
You can’t think your way out of a problem
Most clients aren’t stuck because they haven’t thought enough. They’re stuck because they’ve thought in the same way over and over, and their brain is protecting that way of thinking. As a result, they analyse, reflect, and plan, yet still remain stuck. This is why coaching the problem often does not lead to meaningful change. […]
Coaching Homework: What Works, Who Decides, and What Matters?
Coaching Homework: What Works, Who Decides, and What Matters?
Coaching ‘homework’, sometimes referred to as coaching ‘commitments’, ‘action’, ‘experiments’ or ‘practice’, or more formally as inter-session activity, is a widely used coaching practice. While coaching conversations can create powerful insight, much of the change is thought to happen between sessions. This is where clients begin to apply their learning, try out new approaches, and […]
Most coaching questions aren’t as open as they seem
Most coaching questions aren’t as open as they seem
Coaches are trained to ask open questions. And for the most part, we do. But many of the ‘open’ questions we ask are not quite as open as they seem and still subtly direct our clients. “What do you think?” “How do you feel?” “What do you see?” Each of these questions invites reflection, but […]